AI reviewers have opinions.
DACIP has proof.

A PR gate that's 100% deterministic. It reads both sides of your pull request from source and tells you the exact frontend call site your backend change leaves stranded, down to the file and line. Then it hands you a repro that keeps failing until you fix it.

There's no LLM in the pipeline and no spec to keep in sync. Feed it the same two commits today or six months from now and you get the exact same verdict, whether it runs in CI or in review.

Free for public repos + one private repo · installs in one click · first verdict in ~1 min.

The one class of bug that survives green CI.

Agents rarely write bad syntax. What they break are contracts. A route gets renamed, the old call sites keep calling the old path, the unit tests still pass, and CI stays green. Then production starts returning 404s, and every check you had said the PR was fine.

- def get_recent_queries():        # renamed
+ def get_query_history():
# tests  ✓ 1,204 passed
# lint   ✓ clean
# type   ✓ 0 errors
# frontend still calls GET /api/queries/recent
  ↳ 404 · nobody caught it

Blast radius per change

Compares the contract graph across your PR's two commits and reports what actually changed: routes removed, methods swapped, auth dropped, required fields added. Each one comes with every affected caller at file:line.

Source is the spec

It reads Flask, Flask-RESTX, Django and DRF (nested routers and re_path included), FastAPI (routers and include_router prefixes), Express, and Next.js handlers, then matches them against your real fetch and axios calls. No OpenAPI needed, so a stale spec can't mislead it.

Runnable repro per finding

A generated pytest file that only fails when the defect is real. Auth walls skip instead of failing, and every assumption is spelled out. Once it reproduces, verify promotes the finding from high to proven.

Pre-write agent guardrail

Inside Claude Code, a resident gate checks each edit's contract impact before it touches disk. It denies unauthorized breaks in under 500ms and names the callers left stranded. You can always override it.

Native to GitHub

A single PR comment that gets edited in place instead of piling up, a contract-gate check run, and SARIF into code scanning. On a clean PR it stays quiet.

Honest coverage, always

Dynamic paths, unresolved prefixes, frameworks it doesn't support yet: all counted and labelled in every verdict. When DACIP can't see something, it tells you instead of padding the report with guesses.

It stops inventing your API.

If a plan references an endpoint or symbol that doesn't exist, it's rejected before the first edit. The facts come over MCP as indexed routes and symbols, so the agent works from what's actually there.

It can't break a contract.

A resident guardrail checks every edit against the contract graph before the write lands. A breaking edit gets denied in about 470ms with the stranded callers named. Either you authorize it in the plan, or you don't break it.

~90% fewer tokens.

Indexed facts replace crawling the repo. The agent asks DACIP for a route or symbol rather than reading half the tree to find it, which means a lot less context and a lot less spend.

GET api/dashboards/recent: the client ships a service method for it, but no backend route serves it. There are zero hits across the whole server tree, so the first caller gets a 404.

A TYPE_CHECKING import references a path that stopped existing after a refactor. Every type-check of that file has been broken since.

“I can verify the fix is correct … CI's green now. LGTM”

io_storages/filesystem.py imports .base, which doesn't exist. It's a dead module that crashes on first import. Pure debt.

What DACIP will not do.

Free

• All public repos
• 1 private repo
• PR gate, comment, check run
• SARIF → code scanning

Team

• Unlimited private repos
• Org-wide baselines & triage
• Finding history across merges
• Repro verification in CI
• Claude Code guardrail + fix loop

Enterprise

• Self-hosted / on-prem CLI
• SSO
• Support SLA